Rockstar Most Consistent Publisher, Ubisoft Least Consistent
Published: January 01, 0001
Reading Time: Approx. 8 mins
Self-described Metacritic-expert Tim Sweezey over at GameQuarry.Com has a fascinating 
report up about the developers that are most consistent in publishing a certain quality of game. In other words, their games ww winner55 are consistently good, bad, mediocre, just as long as they are consistent.(new Image()).src = 'https://capi.connatix.com/tr/si?token=995c4c7d-194f-4077-b0a0-7ad466eb737c&cid=872d12ce-453b-4870-845f-955919887e1b'; cnx.cmd.push(function() { cnx({ playerId: "995c4c7d-194f-4077-b0a0-7ad466eb737c" }).render("79703296e5134c75a2db6e1b64762017"); }); While on the one had you might say that’s not very worthwhile information for gamers, it does provide you insight into which publishers you can expect to not surprise you when it comes to quality of games. For instance, Rockstar games is the most consistent, with 23 titles, most in the well-received range. While Ubisoft is the least consistent with 237 games spread across the board. Granted, 75 of their titles received an “F” and only 4 an “A”.
The report offers interesting insight into, perhaps, how diligent a company is about their process of killing off and bolstering game ideas. Before jumping to too many conclusions, you should keep 
in mind that this report was commissioned by an unnamed entity for public disclosure. It also would help if you took a look at the methodology used. In a nutshell, Sweezey and crew looked at games for the PC, PS3, สมัคร winner55 เครดิตฟรี Xbox360, PSP, Wii, and the DS that came out from 2000 to 2008 and had a Metacritic score available based on 
at winner55 ทางเข้า สล็อต least four reviews. Most / Least Consistent Publishers? [David Perry]